WHITEPAPER
The Offensive Security Blueprint: A Guide to Building a Modern, Strategic Program
WHITEPAPER
The Offensive Security Blueprint: A Guide to Building a Modern, Strategic Program

Best Practices for Penetration Testing

Introduction to Penetration Testing

Penetration testing (often called pentesting) is an authorized simulation of a cyberattack. In a pentest, skilled security professionals attempt to breach an organization’s networks, systems, or applications or any business asset with permission, in order to uncover every vulnerability, before real attackers can exploit them. This proactive approach lets organizations choose their hacker: it safely exposes weaknesses so that defenses can be strengthened.

The goal is to strengthen security—for example, by discovering misconfigurations, software flaws, or risky user behaviors that could lead to a breach. In practice, pentests mimic realistic attack scenarios (technical and sometimes social) so that defenders see exactly where they stand.

Key benefits of pentesting

  • Risk identification: Pentests uncover hidden vulnerabilities (software bugs, web-based vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, etc.) that might otherwise go undetected.
  • Defensive validation: They show whether existing security controls (firewalls, intrusion detection, access controls) actually stop attacks or need improvement.
  • Compliance and confidence: Many regulations (such as PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR) require regular testing; pentests also demonstrate to stakeholders that security measures are taken seriously.
  • Proactive security: By finding and fixing issues before an incident, organizations reduce the chance of costly breaches and associated liabilities.

Defining Scope and Objectives

Before testing begins, it’s crucial to define what will be tested and why. The scope of a pentest specifies the assets, applications, systems, or networks included (for example, the public web servers at “company dot com” or internal database servers and work stations). It may cover one or more of these areas: network infrastructure, servers, client-side applications, server-side applications, and even physical security measures. The scope also clarifies boundaries (for instance, external tests only vs. internal tests only, or both), and any parts of the system that are off-limits.

The objectives spell out the goals—for example: to determine if an attacker can exfiltrate customer data or verify that a recent security upgrade actually blocks SQL injection attacks. Defining scope and objectives up front ensures that the test focuses on the organization’s highest priorities and available resources.

Best practices in scoping

  • Targets: Specify exactly which systems and applications are in scope (e.g., network segments, IP ranges, web/mobile applications). Common categories include network infrastructure, servers, desktop or mobile apps, and physical facilities.
  • Test type: Agree whether the test will be external (from outside the network) or internal (inside the network), and whether it is black-box (testers have no prior knowledge) or white-box (full information given) or grey-box (partial knowledge—with credentials provided).
  • Objectives: Set clear goals, such as demonstrating an attacker’s ability to escalate privileges or reach sensitive data. Objectives may prioritize specific risks or compliance requirements.
  • Constraints: Note any limitations (e.g., testing only during non-business hours, excluding certain systems, or temporary pauses for backups) to avoid unintended impact on operations.

Pentest Types: Black Box, White Box, Gray Box

Test Type

Tester's Knowledge

Pros

Cons

Black box

Pentester has no prior knowledge of the system, similar to a real-world attacker.

  • Simulates a realistic external attack, providing a "pure" assessment of defenses from an outsider's perspective.
  • May miss internal or complex flaws.
  • Significant time and effort is spent on reconnaissance and trial-and-error testing to gain privileged access.
  • May not be possible to complete within the allocated timeline.

White box

Pentester is given complete information about the system, including source code and documentation.

  • Allows testers to quickly pinpoint and focus on likely weak areas.
  • Enables the most comprehensive and in-depth code-level analysis.
  • Does not replicate the perspective of a typical external attacker who lacks insider information.

Gray box

Pentester is provided with partial information, e.g., architecture diagrams or sample user credentials.

  • Efficiently uses testing time by allowing the team to orient quickly.
  • Balances realistic discovery with focused testing.
  • Provides space for iterative testing as vulnerabilities are uncovered.
  • Partial knowledge provided may not uncover issues that a full reconnaissance phase (black box) would find.

 

Best Practices for Penetration Testing White Paper Cover Image

All Articles
GDPR Data Protection Requirements: An Executive Overview
Learn how the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) forms a pillar for information privacy in the European Union and European Economic Area.
Learning Center
Aug 18, 2025